B6.14 FEDERAL ASSEMBLY MEMBERS DISQUALIFIED! RUBI0 MARCEN REPEALS THE ‘B0RN IN AMERICA’ ACT OF SENAT0R J. K. KENDRY — TARGETS DUAL CITIZENS AND “CHEATERS.”

“THE NATIONAL LOYALTY WAR: Inside Rubi0 Marcen’s Shocking ‘Born in America’ Repeal and the Political Earthquake That Followed”

At 8:12 a.m. on a quiet Wednesday morning, the Federɑl Assembly convened expecting a standard procedural session — budget corrections, committee updates, and a routine policy overview. Nothing dramatic. Nothing historic.

But five minutes after the session began, everything changed.

Senat0r Rubi0 Marcen walked into the chamber carrying a thin charcoal folder — one so ordinary-looking that no one suspected it contained the spark that would ignite the fiercest political inferno of the decade.

By noon, 14 elected officials would be stripped of their positions, the Capitol would descend into shouting chaos, and a wave of legislative panic would ripple through every political office from coast to coast.

This is the full inside story — the moment Rubi0 detonated the “Born in America” Act, the speech that shook the chamber to its core, the rival bill introduced by Senat0r J. K. Kendry minutes later, and the national loyalty war now tearing the country in two.


1. The Calm Before the Eruption

The session began as it always did — pledge recited, attendance logged, chamber settling into its usual rhythm.
Rubi0 Marcen sat silently, his expression sharp and unreadable. The folder remained untouched in front of him.

Across the room, a handful of dual-citizen members chatted casually. No one sensed danger.

It was only when the majority leader yielded the floor that Rubi0 stood up — not slowly, not dramatically, but with a kind of purpose that made a few nearby aides glance up.

“Madam President,” Rubi0 said, “I rise today with legislation that cannot wait.”

A murmur traveled through the chamber.

Legislation?
Today?
Unannounced?

Every camera turned.


2. “This Is Loyalty!” — The Speech That Set the Capitol on Fire

Rubi0 placed his hand on the folder.

“Today,” he began, “I am introducing a full repeal of the ‘Born in America’ Act written by my colleague Senat0r J. K. Kendry. It has been twisted, misinterpreted, and abused to the point of betrayal.”

He lifted the folder and opened it.

“National service,” he continued, “demands national loyalty. And exclusive loyalty.”

The room stiffened.

Dual citizenship had long been a sensitive topic — tolerated publicly, debated privately, avoided politically.

But Rubi0 wasn’t avoiding anything.

Then he raised his voice:

“This is LOYALTY!”

The shout echoed so sharply that even the stenographers flinched.

Cameras zoomed in.
Reporters outside the chamber pressed their headphones tighter.
Social media lit up in seconds.

Rubi0 continued:

“We cannot — and will not — allow individuals with divided allegiance to steer the direction of our nation. Today, 14 individuals sitting in this very building will be disqualified under the revised loyalty standards.”

Chaos erupted instantly.

Shouts.
Gasps.
A sudden scramble of aides moving toward their representatives.
Two Assembly members stood up protesting before Rubi0 even finished speaking.

But he didn’t stop.

“If you cheated your way into office,” he said, pointing to a row of officials now red-faced and shouting back,
“it’s over.”

The chamber cracked open like a fault line.


3. The “Immediate Disqualification” Clause

Inside Rubi0’s proposal was a clause no one saw coming:

Any elected official with non-exclusive citizenship status shall be immediately suspended pending investigation and potential removal.

It wasn’t a suggestion.
It wasn’t a future amendment.
It was a lightning strike.

Clerks began pulling names.
Aides began packing briefcases.
Phones buzzed nonstop as members demanded legal clarification.

Fourteen names.
Fourteen desks emptied.
Fourteen microphones silenced.

The gallery gasped as the list was read.

Some tried to argue.
Some demanded due process.
Some stormed out.

But the Speaker’s gavel thundered over the chaos:

“Order! ORDER!”

The chamber was boiling.


4. The Capitol Meltdown

As the list of disqualified members circulated, the entire Capitol fractured.

  • Reporters sprinted through corridors.

  • Legal teams rushed into private rooms.

  • Staffers cried, shouted, or froze in shock.

  • Protestors gathered outside within minutes, alerted by live streams.

Security tightened.
Barricades went up.
The chamber floor became a battlefield of ideology.

Rubi0 watched silently, arms crossed, expression calm — almost coldly resolved.

He knew exactly what he was doing.

And he wasn’t finished.


5. The Booing, the Backlash, and Rubi0’s Counterstrike

As Rubi0 returned to his seat, the chamber erupted into boos — the loudest directed from the far-left and center-left blocks, many of whom had deep ties to immigrant communities.

One Assembly member shouted:

“You’ve just disenfranchised millions!”

Another yelled:

“This is unconstitutional!”

But Rubi0 turned back, leaned into the microphone, and delivered the line that instantly became a viral clip:

“The Supreme Court will uphold it.”

The chamber roared.
Some in applause.
Most in fury.

But Rubi0 didn’t blink.

He knew exactly the legal terrain he was stepping onto — and he knew that Kendry, the original author of the older act, was watching.

And then the moment everyone remembers happened.


6. Senat0r J. K. Kendry’s Entrance — “You Can’t Serve Two Flags”

As if appearing on cue, Senat0r J. K. Kendry marched onto the floor, holding a crimson binder under his arm.

He didn’t wait for recognition.
He didn’t wait for silence.
He simply walked to the microphone, slammed the binder onto the podium, and said:

“You can’t serve two flags.
Not in my America.”

The chamber froze.
Even Rubi0 looked surprised.

Kendry continued:

“If Senat0r Marcen is drawing a line today, then I will draw one tomorrow. My sister bill will go further, not just targeting dual citizens — but targeting foreign financial influence across every level of government.”

A few members audibly gasped.

Foreign influence?
Financial ties?
Corporate allegiance audits?

Kendry wasn’t proposing incremental reform — he was threatening to incinerate the entire system.

“The people deserve leaders whose loyalty cannot be bought, borrowed, or shared,” Kendry continued.

The crowd erupted again — but this time, the reactions were split down the middle.

Some cheered.
Some screamed.
Some stormed out.

Kendry didn’t care.

He ended with:

“Senat0r Marcen lit the spark.
I’ll fan the flame.”

The Capitol shook.


7. Behind Closed Doors — The Emergency Meetings

As the public chamber devolved into chaos, behind the scenes a once-in-a-decade chain reaction began.

The Attorney General called an emergency legal review.

Could this be enforced?
Could elected officials be removed without hearings?
Could citizenship status be grounds for disqualification?

The Speaker held a crisis meeting with both party leaders.

Would they support the legislation?
Would they oppose it?
Would it fracture the Assembly permanently?

Legal advisors warned of constitutional conflict.

Four separate amendments could be implicated.
Federal precedent was unclear.
The situation was unprecedented.

Three embassies contacted the State Department.

Foreign governments demanded clarification.
What would happen to their dual citizens serving in U.S. government roles?

Protests erupted outside.

By evening, thousands had gathered.
Some waving flags.
Some carrying torches.
Some holding signs reading:

“Loyalty has borders.”
“Citizenship ≠ purity.”
“No one has the right to decide who is American enough.”

It was no longer legislation.
It was identity.
It was nationalism vs. globalism.
It was a battle for the soul of citizenship.


8. The 14 Disqualified Members — Their Defense

By sunset, the offices of the fourteen affected officials released a joint statement:

“We were elected by American citizens.
We serve American citizens.
We are American citizens.”

The message was passionate — but panic saturated its edges.

Several of the disqualified members filed injunctions.
Others vowed to fight.
One threatened to resign completely from political life.

But the worst blow came when Senator Lysandra Hale — one of the 14 — held a trembling press conference on the steps of the Capitol:

“I have served this nation faithfully for 21 years,” she said, voice cracking.
“My father fought in the military.
My son serves today.
To be told I am not loyal enough — because of my birthplace — is cruelty disguised as patriotism.”

Her speech went viral.

But it didn’t stop the movement.


9. National Reaction — A Country Splitting Down the Middle

Across the nation, lines were drawn.

Supporters celebrated:

“Finally! Someone defending the flag!”
“Dual citizens should not write our laws.”
“This is the loyalty test we’ve needed!”

Opponents protested:

“This is authoritarianism.”
“America was built by immigrants — now they’re punished?”
“This is unconstitutional and dangerous.”

Cable networks ran 24-hour coverage.
Talk radio exploded with outrage and support.
Social media split into two warring factions.

Everywhere, one question circulated:

Is loyalty singular or layered?

No one agreed.


10. Kendry’s Sister Bill — The One Even Marcen Didn’t Expect

The next morning, Kendry unveiled the outline of his sister bill — internally nicknamed “The Purity Ledger.”

It proposed:

  • Background checks for foreign financial links

  • Mandatory audits for politicians’ overseas assets

  • Restrictions on foreign-born donors

  • A ban on foreign-tied corporations funding political campaigns

  • Investigations into foreign familial influence

The media exploded with reactions ranging from horror to applause.

Six commentators called it “the most extreme patriotism measure in a century.”
Two called it “necessary.”
One called it “political suicide.”

But Kendry pressed forward:

“Every leader should choose — this country or another.
Not both.
Not halfway.”

Marcen, unexpectedly, took a half-step back, saying:

“My bill was about citizenship. Kendry’s is something… larger.”

For the first time, cracks appeared between the two senators who just hours earlier seemed aligned.


11. Why Now? The Political Motive

Political analysts scrambled to decode the strategy behind Marcen’s sudden move.

Several theories emerged:

A. A pre-2028 loyalty realignment.

Patriotism was becoming a key voter issue.
Marcen wanted to be the face of it.

B. Internal pressure from rising nationalist blocs.

Party factions demanded loyalty tests.
Marcen gave them one.

C. A shift in global geopolitics.

Foreign tensions were rising.
Marcen sensed a moment to capitalize.

D. Personal ambition.

Some claimed Marcen was preparing for a leadership run.
Others said he wanted to corner Kendry.

E. A wedge issue to fracture political opposition.

Citizenship is emotional.
Identity is explosive.
Marcen weaponized both.

The truth?
No one knew for sure.

But the timing was no accident.


12. Inside the Kirk–Marcen Rift

Despite appearing aligned publicly, insiders whispered that Kendry’s bold escalation irritated Marcen.

Marcen wanted:

  • A clear loyalty test

  • A symbolic show of strength

  • A targeted political shake-up

Kendry, however, wanted:

  • A systemic overhaul

  • A multi-level loyalty doctrine

  • A reshaping of the entire political landscape

One Capitol aide described it perfectly:

“Marcen lit the fire.
Kendry turned it into a wildfire.”

This unintended escalation created tension — and possibility.

Who would lead the movement?
Who would the voters rally behind?
Who would survive the backlash?

Ambition, once aligned, was now competing.


13. The Fallout — What Happens Next?

Over the next 72 hours, the crisis expanded exponentially:

  • Courts received 39 emergency filings

  • Three governors issued statements

  • Four universities staged demonstrations

  • Two foreign ambassadors demanded clarity

  • Cable news ratings hit record highs

  • Opinion polling shifted dramatically

  • Donations surged for both sides

The Capitol became a fortress of confusion.

Every office buzzed with panic.
Every hallway echoed with arguments.
Every committee fought over jurisdiction.

This wasn’t a bill anymore.

It was a national identity war.


14. The Question That Now Haunts America

By the end of the week, one question overshadowed all others:

“What does it mean to be American?”

Is it birthplace?
Is it citizenship?
Is it loyalty?
Is it exclusivity?
Is it history?
Is it choice?

Rubi0 Marcen had forced the country to confront a debate many preferred to avoid.

And Senat0r J. K. Kendry had pushed it far further than anyone expected.

The storm had just begun.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *